Emodnet-Arctic

IUCN Categories

Summary
In this task, a database of Arctic MPAs was set up based on the World Database of MPAs in combination with a number of other databases. Each MPA was assigned to a IUCN category.

Table 1. IUCN Categories (for details, see the IUCN classification)

IUCN category Description
Ia Strict Nature Reserve
Ib Wilderness area
II National Park
III Natural Monument or feature
IV Habitat/species management area
V Protected landscape/seascape
VI Protected area with sustainable use of natural resources
Not Reported For protected areas where an IUCN category is unknown and/or the data provider has not provided any related information.
Not Applicable The IUCN Management Categories are not applicable to a specific designation type. This currently applies to World Heritage Sites and UNESCO MAB Reserves.
  Not Applicable also applies to a site that does not fit the standard definition of a protected area (PA_DEF field = 0).
Not Assigned The protected area meets the standard definition of protected areas (PAF_DEF = 1) but the data provider has chosen not to use the IUCN Protected Area Management Categories.

 

Back to top ^

Results
IUCN Classification: 492 MPAs were included in the database and classified according to the IUCN classification (Table 1). This includes 57 MPAs that were added during this project . These additional MPAs lacked an IUCN classification (‘blanks’). Classifications were assigned to each new MPA based on their specific characteristics. The classifications assigned were mainly CAT IV (8 OSPAR MPAs), CAT VI  (38 NOAA MPAs near Alaska: a lot of fishery measures.) and ‘Not Applicable’  in case of the 11 CBD EBSAs.

In addition, 71 MPAs within the World Database of MPAs had been classified as ‘not applicable’ or ‘not reported’. In this project, we attempted to classify these as well. For example, the UNESCO-MAB Biosphere reserve (one site, covering about 40% of Greenland) was classified as ‘1B’, and the RAMSAR Sites (35 sites) were classified as ‘VI’. World Heritage Sites (4 sites) were classified as ‘IA’ and ‘IB’. A number of different Norwegian sites (15 sites) are still under consideration, and another group is classified under different categories (see individual sites in the map viewer). RAMSAR definitions were consulted to translate to IUCN categories. This was also done for MPAs from other sources.

Of the total number and surface of MPAs, Norway has most areas assigned (206; Table 2), while the total surface of MPAs (km2) is highest for the USA (Figures 3, 4; Table 1). Per data source, most areas were assigned to only one IUCN category (Figures 5, 6; Table 2).

The World Database of MPAs contained eight MPAs that were removed from the 2015 database (one Russian and seven USA). These areas are shown on the map below (Figure 7).

MPAs classified according to IUCN categories Fig 7 // mpa-according-iucn_fig7.png (768 K)
Figure 7. MPAs in the Arctic classified according to the IUCN categories (final results, July 2016). The IUCN categories are: Ia - Strict Nature Reserve, Ib -Wilderness area, II - National Park, III - Natural Monument or feature, IV - Habitat/species management area, V - Protected landscape/seascape, VI -Protected area with sustainable use of natural resources (for details, see the IUCN classification). Not Applicable: the IUCN Management Categories are not applicable to a specific designation type. This currently applies to World Heritage Sites and UNESCO MAB Reserves. Not Applicable also applies to a site that does not fit the standard definition of a protected area (PA_DEF field = 0). Not Reported: For protected areas where an IUCN category is unknown and/or the data provider has not provided any related information.

Back to top ^

Pie-chart showing MPAs Fig 1
Figure 1. Pie-chart showing number of MPAs per IUCN category.

Back to top ^

Pie-chart showing coverage Fig 2
Figure 2. Pie-chart showing coverage % (km2) of MPAs per IUCN category.

Back to top ^

Classification IUCN categories Fig 3
Figure 3. Classification in IUCN categories per region. Y-axis: Number of MPAs, X-axis: countries or regions.

Back to top ^

Pie-chart showing surface Fig 4
Figure 4. Pie-chart showing surface (km2) covered by MPAs per region.

Back to top ^

Classification IUCN categories Fig 5
Figure 5. Classification in IUCN categories per source. Y-axis: Number of MPAs, X-axis: data sources.

Back to top ^

Pie-chart showing surface Fig 6
Figure 6. Pie-chart showing surface (km2) covered by MPAs per data source.

Back to top ^

Table 2. MPAs per country/region

  IUCN category (reviewed)
Country Ia Ib II III IV V VI Not Applicable Not Reported Grand Total
Canada 6 15 12 4     10     47
Denmark   1               1
Greenland   6 1 3 1   9     20
Iceland 3     7 12 12 9     43
Norway 144   2 3 29 5 8 15   206
Svalbard & Jan Mayen 22   7 1     5     35
Russia 12 1     17   11 9 10 60
US of America   5 1   21 7 44     78
Open Sea               2   2
Grand Total 187 28 23 18 80 24 96 26 10 492

 

Back to top ^

Table 3. MPAs per source

  IUCN category (reviewed)
Source description Ia Ib II III IV V VI Not Applicable Not Reported Grand Total
WDPA2015Nov 186 27 23 18 72 22 52   10 410
WDPA2014Oct*   1         6     7
CBD_EBSA_2016               11   11
MiljodirektoratetMarinVPa 1             10   11
MiljodirektoratetMarinVPb               5   5
MPAtlas2015           2       2
NOAA MPA2014             38     38
OSPAR MPA         8         8
Grand Total 187 28 23 18 80 24 96 26 10 492

 *These MPAs were in not in the WDPA 2015 version, but were included in our database.

Back to top ^


 

References